decision sent to author nature communications

Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. . :t]1:oFeU2U-:T7OQoh[%;ca wX~2exXOI[u:?=pXB0X'ixsv!5}eY//(4sx}&pYoIk=mK ZE This result does not change significantly if we focus on the three institution groups we defined (high-, medium-, and low-prestige), thus excluding the fourth group for which no THE rank was found (Pearsons chi-square test results: 2=49.405, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.064), which means that authors from less prestigious institutions tend to be rejected more than authors from more prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. J Lang Evol. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. This page provides information on peer review performance and citation metrics for Nature Communications. Authors might choose SBPR when submitting their best work as they are proud of it and may opt for DBPR for work of lower quality, or, the opposite could be true, that is, authors might prefer to submit their best work as DBPR to give it a fairer chance against implicit bias. Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage. In general, authors from countries with a more recent history of academic excellence are more likely to choose DBPR. In our case, the option that the outcome is subject to a complex combination of soft constraints or incentives is possible, which supports our simpler approach of evaluating the variables with the bivariate approach we have reported on. Answer: From the description of the status change of the submission, it seems the manuscript did not pass the formatting check by the editorial staff and required corrections from the author. 2021 Journal Metrics. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision Original letter from Ben Cravatt in early 2000 after our meeting at UCSF when he sent me a sample of his FP-biotin probe to test in my laboratory. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. In the following analysis, we will refer to the data where the gender field is not NA as the Gender Dataset. 0000011085 00000 n Carlsson F, Lfgren , Sterner T. Discrimination in scientific review: a natural field experiment on blind versus non-blind reviews. This status will remain until you begin the process of submitting your revision. I submitted to Nature Neuroscience about 9 days ago and it's been "under consideration" for about a week. Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid implicit referee bias in academic publishing. We employed hypothesis testing techniques to test various hypotheses against the data. Manuscript then goes into said editor's pile, and waits until it gets to the front of the line. In order to see whether the final decision outcome could be accurately predicted based on author and journal characteristics, we attempted to fit logistic regression models to the data. This first-of-its-kindoption, called In Review, brought to you by our partners at Research Square, makes it easy to share a preprint of your manuscript on the Research Square platform andgives you real time updates onyour manuscripts progress through peer review. ISSN 2041-1723 (online). 0000001568 00000 n Perspect Psychol Sci. At the point of first submission, authors have to indicate whether they wish to have their manuscript considered under SBPR or DBPR, and this choice is maintained if the manuscript is declined by one journal and transferred to another. We used a significance threshold of 0.05. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually happens in a certain order, however an individual submission can skip a phase, or return back to an earlier phase, depending on Editor actions. If an author wishes to appeal against Nature 's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer than you had anticipated. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Eigenfactor Score calculation is based on the number of times articles from the journal published in the past five years have been cited in the JCR year, but it also considers which journals have contributed these citations so that highly cited journals will influence the network more than lesser cited journals. . von | Mai 21, 2022 | safello aktie flashback | Mai 21, 2022 | safello aktie flashback The report will be advisory to the editors. 0000082326 00000 n When analysing uptake data by journal tier, we have included both direct submissions and transfers incoming to each journal group, for a total of 128,457 manuscripts that were submitted to one of the 25 Nature-branded journals. manuscripts originally submitted to a journal and subsequently transferred to another journal which was deemed a better fit by the editor. Tulare Ca Obituaries, n - botln botkyrka kommun. Because of the small size of the data set for accepted papers and of the lack of an independent measure for the quality of the manuscripts, we could not draw firm conclusions on the existence of implicit bias and on the effectiveness of DBPR in reducing or removing it. In order to detect any bias towards institutional prestige, we referred to a dataset containing 20,706 records, which includes OTR papers that were either rejected or accepted, as well as transfers. At Nature Biomedical Engineering, we collect some numbers into a 'journal dashboard': These numbers are running statistics over 6-month intervals (to smooth out fluctuations in the numbers*). https://www.grid.ac. PLOS ONE. More specifically, the proportion of authors choosing DBPR is lower for higher ranking institution groups; in the uptake analysis by country, China and the USA stand out for their strong preference for DBPR and SBPR, respectively. The meaning of 'reject & resubmit' is to indicate that in principle the editor likes the topic for their journal, but the current paper is . We aimed at modelling acceptance based on the following variables (and all their subsets): review type (SB/DB), corresponding authors gender, the group of their institution (1, 2, 3, or 4), the category of their country (Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK, the USA, and Others), and the journal tier (Nature, Nature sister journals, and Nature Communications). Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. These results suggest that the choice of DBPR may be linked with a higher perceived risk of discrimination, with the exception of gender discrimination. . We focus on the Nature journals as that portfolio covers a wide range of disciplines in the natural sciences and biomedical research, and thus, it gives us an opportunity to identify trends beyond discipline-specific patterns. Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal metrics are based on the published output, thus those that are calculated from the output in multiple years will use a partial dataset for recently launched journals. To obtain The present study focusses on the effects of this publisher intervention in the 2years following implementation and can guide others when evaluating the consequences of introducing DBPR to their journals. Sorry we couldn't be helpful. 2006;81(5):705. A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript tracking account for the . Often commercial sensors do not provide researchers with sufficient raw and open data; therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an open and customizable system to classify cattle behaviors. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. Is double-blinded peer review necessary? Another possibility is that the predictors are correlated, thus preventing a good fit. Sodexo Disney Springs, Type of Peer Review BBRC is a rapid communications journal. The following is an example of a poor cover letter: Dear Editor-in-Chief, I am sending you our manuscript entitled "Large Scale Analysis of Cell Cycle Regulators in bladder cancer" by Researcher et al. 0000062196 00000 n Papers from more prestigious institutions are more likely to be sent to review than papers from less prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. 2.3 Procedures Communications Arising submissions that meet Nature's initial selection criteria are sent to the authors of the original paper for a response, and the exchange to independent referees. There is not yet sufficient data to conclude which form of peer reviewtransparent or double-blindis the most conducive to rigorous and unbiased science reporting. 0000006171 00000 n We also analysed the OTR rates by gender of the corresponding author, regardless of review type. If your manuscript is sent to reviewers, please share with the community how many days the evaluated process took by editor's office (not include the evaluated process of reviewers). Posted on 31st May 2022 by 31st May 2022 by Make the correction notice free to view. Our results show that we cannot say that there is a significant difference between authors from prestigious institutions and authors from less prestigious institutions for DBPR-accepted manuscripts. 0000001795 00000 n Research Square converts the manuscript to HTML, assigns a DOI, and posts on the platform with a CC-BY license. Over the past years, several studies have analysed the efficacy of DBPR in eradicating implicit bias in specific scientific disciplines. Res Integr Peer Rev 3, 5 (2018). However, we were unable to distinguish the effects of gender bias (from reviewers) and manuscript quality in this observation because an analysis of acceptance rate by gender and review type did not yield statistically significant results. Nevertheless, the available data allowed us to draw conclusions on the uptake of the review models, as we detail below. Which proportions of papers are accepted for publication under SBPR and DBPR? The target number of required reviews has been completed, and the Handling Editor is considering the reviews. eLife. Transfer of papers between Cell Press journals and Molecular Plant. Back to top. Thank you for your feedback, it will help us serve you better. . If authors choose DBPR, their details (names and affiliations) are removed from the manuscript files, and it is the authors responsibility to ensure their own anonymity throughout the text and beyond (e.g. The WeWork Decision. 1 Answer to this question. sean penn parkinson's disease 2021. korttidsminne test siffror; lng eller kort pipa hagel. This measure is roughly analogous to the 5-Year Journal Impact Factor in that it is a ratio of a journal's citation influence to the size of the journal's article contribution over a period of five years. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings. isolera golv plintgrund waiting to send decision to author nature. After review, Nature Communications rejected it because of reason X. We only retained a normalised institution name and country when the query to the GRID API returned a result with a high confidence, and the flag manual review was set to false, meaning that no manual review was needed. The area under the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve is 0.65. We excluded papers for which the post-review outcome was a revision and papers which were still under review; thus, the dataset for this analysis comprises 20,706 records of which 8934 were accepted and 11,772 were rejected. We fitted logistic regression models and report details on their goodness of fit. (But be sure all your coauthors agree to opt-in, too.) A test for equality of proportions for groups 1 and 2 for DBPR papers showed a non-significant result (2=0.13012, df=1, p value=0.7183), and the same test on group 2 and group 3 for DBPR papers showed a significant result (2=40.898, df=1, p value <0.001). 3. level 1. Submission Experiences Duration from Submission to the First Editorial Decision How many days did the entire process take? 0000004174 00000 n Click on the journal name to where you submitted your manuscript. Let us suggest an alternative journal within our esteemed publishing portfolio for resubmitting your manuscript (and any reviewer comments) for fast, effortless publication. For other authors characteristics, such as institutional prestige, a quality factor is more likely than for gender: it is not unthinkable to assume that on average manuscripts from more prestigious institutions, which tend to have more resources, are of a higher quality than those from institutions with lower prestige and fewer means. Title page: A separate title page is necessary and should bear a) the title of the article, b) name of the authors, c) the institutions of origin, d) a short title and for Short Communications also the corresponding author's name, address, and e-mail.Please note that it should be a maximum of 5 authors for Short Communications. Submission to Accept: the median time (in days) from the published submission date to the final editorial acceptance date. authors opting for DBPR should not post on preprint archives). The page will refresh upon submission. Does "Decision Sent to Author " before the peer review stage - reddit Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. This study provides insight on authors behaviour when submitting to high-impact journals. Accepted articles are automatically sent to the production department once the Editor has made a final decision of 'Accept'. Please watch the Submission status explainer video below for more information. LZ. If you have no email from the journal and have already checked the spam folder of your mailbox, you may check if the submission . Nature For this analysis, we included direct submissions as well as transferred manuscripts, because the editorial criteria vary by journal and a manuscript rejected by one journal and transferred to another may then be sent out to review. The effect of blinding on review quality. 0000002247 00000 n Real Cuban Link Chain For Sale Near Mumbai, Maharashtra, The underlying research question that drove this study is to assess whether DBPR is effective in removing or reducing implicit reviewer bias in peer review. We however included transfers in all other analyses because we considered the analysed items as combinations of three attributes: paper, corresponding author, and journal to which the paper was submitted. n/a. 2007;18(2):MR000016. 25th Apr, 2017. The post-review outcome of papers as a function of the institution group and review model (Table15) showed that manuscripts from less prestigious institutions are accepted at a lower rate than those from more prestigious ones, even under DBPR; however, due to the small numbers of papers at this stage, the results are not statistically significant. Nature-branded journals publishing primary research introduced DBPR as an optional service in March 2015 in response to authors requests [17]. EDR is employed by Macmillan Publishers Ltd, which publishes the Nature-branded journals. If you have no email from the journal and have already checked the spam folder of your mailbox, you may check if the submission . There is a small but significant association between institution group and acceptance (Pearsons chi-square test results: 2=49.651, df=3, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.049). This reply will be sent to the author of the Correspondence before publication. reparationstapet kllare . Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Malay S, Zhong L, Weinstein A, Rohrich RJ. A PDF has been built, either by you or by the editor, that requires your approval to move forward. Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage : r/labrats - Reddit by | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. Decision Sent to Author 2020-07-09 08:38:16 Decision Pending 2020-06-29 08:28:42 Under Review 2020-06-25 09:38:03 Under Editorial Consideration 2020-06-23 10:09:56 Manuscript Submission 2020-04-09 14:44:05 Stage Start Date Manuscript Ready for Publication 2020-07-16 10:45:24 . This decision is the sole responsibility of the . 2019. One reviewer admitted the specific field wasn't in his/hers expertise. Example: Blood Cancer Journal: Go to the 'Publish with us' drop down menu: Click on 'Submit manuscript' in order to be directed to that journal's manuscript tracking system: For the status of your submission to Scientific Reports,go to the Scientific Reports contact webpage for email addresses to determine which one best fits your requirements. EDR proposed the study and provided the data on manuscript submissions and the gender data from Gender API. The decision involved a ruling on a motion to . 0000003764 00000 n We found a significant result (2=37.76, df=2, p value <0.001). For example, a report showed that 34% of 880 manuscripts submitted to two radiology journals contained information that would either potentially or definitely reveal the identities of the authors or their institution [2]. This means that there is a statistically significant difference between the three groups. Most journals have online submission systems, which have definitely made it easier and quicker for authors to submit their manuscripts. Based on the Nature Photonics Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 11.4 days to get the first editorial decision. All papers submitted from January 2016 qualify for this scheme. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 0000014828 00000 n Accessed 15 Jan 2017. We also attempted to fit a generalized linear mixed effects model with a random effect for the country category, as we can assume that the data is sampled by country and observations from the same country share characteristics and are not independent. Any correspondence, queries or additional requests for information on the Manuscript Submission process should be sent to the Natural Product Communications editorial office as follows: [email protected], 614-786-1970. The data that support the findings of this study are available from Springer Nature but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. In a systematic review and meta-analysis of biomedical journals investigating the interventions aimed at improving the quality of peer review in these publications, the authors reported that DBPR did not affect the quality of the peer review report or rejection rate [4]. For some journals, the status may include the decision term e.g. Springer is committed to your publishing success: If your research is of good quality, then it may be suitable for another journal. When the Editors begin to enter a decision it will move the status to 'Decision in Process'. A test for equality of proportions for groups 1 and 2 for SBPR papers returned a significant difference (2=331.62, df=1, p value <0.001); the same test for group 2 and group 3 for SBPR papers also returned a significant difference (2=464.86, df=1, p value <0.001). No, Modified on: Mon, 5 Sep, 2022 at 6:52 PM. Our main question concerns a possible gender bias; therefore, we investigated the relation between OTR rates, review model, and gender, still including both direct submissions and transfers (Table8). Includes a detailed report with feedback and, for journal manuscripts, publishing advice and journal recommendations based on our editors' detailed assessment of your findings. 9 0 obj << /Linearized 1 /O 11 /H [ 1335 254 ] /L 93263 /E 83910 /N 2 /T 92966 >> endobj xref 9 45 0000000016 00000 n 0000007420 00000 n and JavaScript. In Review | SpringerNature | Authors | Springer Nature We employed descriptive statistics for data exploration, and we tested our hypotheses using Pearsons chi-square and binomial tests. Check Status". Don't wait too long. We also performed logistic regression modelling with author update, out-to-review, and acceptance as response, and journal tier, author gender, author country, and institution as predictors. Arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), is a way to resolve disputes outside the judiciary courts.The dispute will be decided by one or more persons (the 'arbitrators', 'arbiters' or 'arbitral tribunal'), which renders the 'arbitration award'. 9.3 weeks. What happens after my manuscript is accepted? We aimed at modelling uptake (baseline SB) based on the following variables (and all their subsets): corresponding authors gender, the group of their institution (1, 2, 3, or 4), the category of their country (Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK, the USA, and Others), and the journal tier (Nature, Nature sister journals, and Nature Communications). The analysis of success outcome at both the out-to-review and acceptance stages could in principle reveal the existence of any reviewer bias against authors characteristics. Similar results were reported for the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [5]. All other data has been produced by Clarivate Analytics. The Publications Ethics Committee is composed of a chair and two members appointed by the RSNA Board. Rejection of your paper / manuscript : Nature Support Finally, we investigated the uptake of the peer review models by country of the corresponding author for the entire portfolio, using data on all of the 106,373 manuscripts. PDF Brief Communications and Communications Arising - Ju Li volume3, Articlenumber:5 (2018) Brown RJC. The aims of this study are to analyse the demographics of corresponding authors choosing double-blind peer review and to identify differences in the editorial outcome of manuscripts depending on their review model. Your new or revised submission has been sent back by the Editorial Team for changes prior to review. 2000;90(4):71541. Thus, our unit of analysis is identified by three elements: the manuscript, the corresponding author, and the journal. The outcome both at first decision and post review is significantly more negative (i.e. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made The corresponding author takes responsibility for the manuscript during the submission, peer review and production process. (The FAQ has more details about the mechanics of how this works.). Thus, we cannot draw conclusions on any editor bias. Based on these results, we cannot conclude whether the referees are biased towards gender. . 0000062401 00000 n Privacy A useful set of articles providing general advice about writing and submitting scientific papers can Manuscript # . If we compare the proportion of accepted manuscripts under DBPR and authored by female vs. male corresponding authors (26 vs. 25%) with a test for equality of proportions with continuity correction, we find that there is a not a significant difference in female authors and male authors for DBPR-accepted papers (results of two-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction: 2=0.03188, df=1, p value=0.8583). In the SBPR case, we cannot reject the null hypothesis. In Review clearly links your manuscript to the journal reviewing it, while its in review. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. 4;N>0TjAWSI#|9aJs]PZYp M#M%,f-);k'\C/*('O2 X(^tL4[msd\5n9cIh(?J0yVg5[5(z,|j}(mLR:V#P/lAD~"jhQT H+}0Z3Nj>!76{7#FMxgiqyym qo=CFf.oA:+ 6hlXT?:SNMZ/|)wj 44X7^tkp+:LL4 P30 Lite Android 11 Release Date, So, in October 2018, we added a new . Decision sent to author NZip for reviewers hoi4 what to do when capitulate. You can see an example in the article above. 0000001589 00000 n 2006;6:12747. Nature Communications is an open access, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the biological, physical, chemical and Earth sciences. 2002;179(6):14157. Nature Communications was another publishing master stroke for Nature that also took advantage of a new market opportunity. This can potentially skew our results if, for example, there are differences in the proportion of names that cannot be attributed between genders. Press J to jump to the feed. 2015;136(6):136977. We aimed at modelling OTR decisions based on the following variables (and all their subsets): review type (SB/DB), corresponding authors gender, the group of their institution (1, 2, 3, or 4), the category of their country (Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK, the USA, and Others), and the journal tier (Nature, Nature sister journals, and Nature Communications). Goldin C, Rouse C. Orchestrating impartiality: the impact of blind auditions on female musicians. Decision Summary. Please enter your feedback to submit this form, Journal Article Publishing Support Center. There . Table11 displays the accept rate by review type defined as the number of accepted papers over the total number of accepted or rejected papers. Once a paper is submitted, the journal editors proceed with their assessment of the work and decide whether each manuscript is sent out for review (OTR) to external reviewers. Am Econ Rev. Each journal is able to customize the wording of the status terms, but the same status phases apply to all journals using Editorial Manager. We have analysed a large dataset of submissions to 25 Nature journals over a period of 2years by review model and in dependence of characteristics of the corresponding author. Decide and Notify authors of decisions made on articles. Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988. R-CAPTCHA. 0000013595 00000 n As mentioned in the Methods section, we have used a commercial algorithm to attribute gender based on first names, and discarded records that could not be matched with accuracy greater than 80%. Find submission status of your article / manuscript - Nature Support Results on the uptake are shown in Table5. For DBPR papers, we found a statistically significant difference in the OTR rate by gender (2=7.5042, df=1, p value=0.006155); for SBPR papers, we did not find a statistically significant difference in the OTR rate by gender (2=0.72863, df=1, p value=0.3933). sean penn parkinson's disease 2021. korttidsminne test siffror; lng eller kort pipa hagel. 2002;17(8):34950. Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. The Alan Turing Institute, London, England, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Modern and Medieval Languages, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Springer Nature, 4 Crinan Street, London, UK, You can also search for this author in Between September 2017 and June 2020, Nature Communications offered authors the option to list the preprints of papers hosted on any community-recognised platform and undergoing peer review.

Arsenal Jobs For 16 Year Olds, Tiffany Huggie Earrings, Articles D