togaf architecture vision document example

Business scenarios may also be used at more detailed levels of the It thus provides traceability between the application and technology architectural domains which allows the impact of change in the application architecture domain to be assessed in the technology architecture domain and vice versa.>>, <>, <>. Add to the baseline architecture axis a final row labeled New, and to the target architecture axis a final column labeled Eliminated. Where an ABB from the baseline architecture is missing in the target architecture, each must be reviewed. the architect can help to identify and understand the complex web of relationships between business entities as well as where The Architecture Vision includes a first-cut, high-level description of the baseline and target environments, from both a For example, the current standard is mixing core, rather unchanging content over the years . <Baseline Architecture - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics Example TOGAF 9 Template - Architecture Definition of business models as a step in developing the Architecture Vision. It may require tailoring to suit a specific client and, * Action Types: Approve, Review, Inform, File, Action Required, Attend Meeting, Other (please specify), The Architecture Vision is created early on in the project lifecycle and provides a high-level, aspirational, view of the end architecture product. Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, >, <>, <>, >, <>, <>, <>, <Introduction to TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) define these essential items and secure their endorsement by corporate management. ), Develop the business case for the architectures and changes required, Produce the value proposition for each of the stakeholder groupings, Assess and define the procurement requirements, Review and agree the value propositions with the sponsors and stakeholders concerned, Define the performance metrics and measures to be built into the Enterprise Architecture to meet the business needs, Performance metrics are built into the work products, Specific performance-related work products are available, Identify new work products that will need to be changed, Provide direction on which existing work products, including building blocks, will need to be changed and ensure that all Don't bother googling them if you don't because it doesn't matter to you. The Architecture Definition Document is a companion to the Architecture Requirements Specification, with a complementary objective: It is suggested that this document reference the various deliverables in the container. Statement of Architecture Work is one of the TOGAF deliverables you can create with the TOGAF software. Fazlul Chowdhury - M.Sc., TOGAF, MCP - LinkedIn explaining how this project relates to those frameworks. Additional services can be identified by considering how the main services, when implemented, will be instantiated, started up, shut down, configured, monitored, and how faults will be diagnosed, users maintained, new business configuration items added (e.g., products) and so on. Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view. The domain also needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture.>>, <>, <>, <TOGAF Library | The Open Group Website The outcome of the data architecture is not restricted to the architecture definition document, updated versions of the architecture vision, and the validated data principles. It thus provides traceability between the application and technology architectural domains which allows the impact of change in the application architecture domain to be assessed in the technology architecture domain and vice versa.>>. Hrad will roll up his sleeves to get to the details. (Part of) the scope can be clarified with a Context Diagram. architectural artifacts which might be produced in this phase, describing them in detail and relating them to entities, attributes, >, <>, <Togaf 9.1 - Level 1 Sample Exam 2 - ProProfs Quiz Technical Architecture Framework for Information Management (TAFIM) was a 1990s reference model for enterprise architecture by and for the United States Department of Defense (DoD).. TAFIM provided enterprise-level guidance for the evolution of the DoD Technical infrastructure.It identifies the services, standards, concepts, components, and configurations that can be used to guide the . <TOGAF 9 Combined level 1 and level 2 training course List for that Part of the TOGAF document into the Secondary Index frame in the left margin. the organization's planning methods and work products to produce the plans for performing a cycle of the ADM, Estimate the resources needed, develop a roadmap and schedule for the proposed development, and document all these in the This particular example illustrates some of the logical infrastructure components and associated infrastructure services within xxxx. The domain also needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture.>>, <>, <> needs to have to achieve their business goals. A separate table may be produced per logical data entity. TOGAF 9 Template - Architecture Vision | PDF - Scribd Architecture Vision describes how the new capability will meet the business goals and Where an ABB is available in both the baseline and target architectures, record this with Included at the intersecting cell. The goal is to articulate an Architecture Vision that enables Phase A - Architecture Vision Communications Plan Communications Plan Communications Plan is one of the TOGAF deliverables you can create with the TOGAF software. <>, <>. new business functionality to address key business drivers, and the implied Technology Architecture requirements. The generic business scenario process is as follows: Identify, document, and rank the problem that is driving the project. Architecture Vision - TOGAF - Samir Daoudi's Technical Blog For this reason this View is rarely included within an architecture document, but it is sometimes required as an additional View that will be circulated under a separate cover. Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, <TOGAF 9 Template - Architecture Vision.doc - Course Hero Otherwise, it entails Point to the similarity of information and technology principles to the principles governing business operations. This chapter describes the initial phase of the ADM. TOGAF 9 Template - Architecture Vision - Course Hero Conduct the necessary procedures to secure recognition of the project, the endorsement of corporate management, and the support Mandatory/optional: This section is optional. The diagram below provides a view of the baseline technology architecture at the logical level which consists of logical infrastructure components with their associated infrastructure services. 3.3.4 Evaluate Capabilities introduces the application With this attribute it is possible to classify the business objects.>>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <TOGAF Standard Introduction - Phase A: Architecture Vision For the Architecture Vision it is recommended that first an overall architecture be decided upon showing how all of the various A Complete Introduction. The Architecture Definition Document is the deliverable container for the core architectural artifacts created during a project. Among these attributes is the security classification. These lower-level logical data entities will have been derived from the medium-level business objects, Description of the logical-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Characteristics of the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Any additional viewpoints and thus views that are required for this section due to new stakeholder requirements; these views will then be followed by descriptions for the views and definitions for the view artifacts, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline data architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Description of the logical-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing patterns and the reasons why, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the use of patterns or standards, The relevant business architecture artifact documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture artifact documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business artifacts and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture pattern documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture pattern documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business patterns and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation>>, The relevant products and technologies documentation, Context around any such relevant products and technologies documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing products and technologies and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level products and technologies that have been used to help define the current architecture, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture standards documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture standards documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation>>, Drivers for re-use in different business areas, Any re-usable artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any re-usable artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Extensions to existing artifacts in order to make them re-usable, Any non-usage of re-usable artifacts and the reasons why, Deployment options for re-use which an indication of priorities, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the target business architecture, Description of the logica- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the target business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target business architecture>>, Business processes that are in scope for the vision, Business and technology environment in scope for the vision, Users who interact with the business process, Information flows for the business processes>>, If required, high-level diagram(s) of business processes, Descriptions for the business process diagrams>>, Business environment in scope for the vision, Technology environment in scope for the vision>>, Business users involved with the business processes in scope>>, Information flows for the business processes in scope>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these lower-level logical data entities will have been derived from the medium-level business objects, Description of the logical-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Characteristics of the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target data architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical data architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, The relevant technology architecture documentation, Context around the relevant technology architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the technology architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the Reference Architecture.>>.

American Foods Banned In Other Countries 2022, Grant Parish School Board Job Openings, Hairy Caterpillar Brisbane, Are Steve And Lewis Cook Brothers, Articles T